The WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange,  walked free after nine days in jail  last night when a high court judge  released him on bail. However, the judge warned him that he is almost  certain to be extradited to Sweden to face sex assault allegations.
The  court refused an attempt by the Crown Prosecution Service to stop  Assange being freed, but imposed tougher bail conditions than previously  outlined by a lower court, which meant his lawyers had to scramble to  meet them before he was returned to prison for another night.
Finally  Assange emerged on to the steps of the high court at 5.46pm, as snow  began to fall, to make a defiant statement and to thank his supporters.
"I  hope to continue my work and to continue to protest my innocence in  this matter and to reveal, as we get it, as we have not yet, the  evidence from these allegations," he said.
As well as the prospect  of a trial in Sweden, there is a growing consensus among US  constitutional lawyers and other legal experts that Assange will be  indicted by Washington. After his release he said that even if he were  indicted in the US, the spilling of state secrets would continue. He  said that WikiLeaks was a "resilient organisation" that could "withstand  decapitation attacks".
Last week City of Westminster magistrates  remanded Assange in custody because they said he posed too high a danger  of absconding. On Tuesday his lawyers won a reversal of that decision,  with a judge granting him bail on tough conditions – but the CPS  appealed.
Yesterday at the high court Mr Justice Ouseley rejected  the CPS argument that there were no conditions a judge could impose that  would stop Assange from fleeing. He ordered the CPS to pay costs but  imposed new conditions on Assange.
His bail will see him stay at  Ellingham Hall in Norfolk, owned by Vaughan Smith, a former army  captain, who was approved to provide surety at Tuesday's hearing along  with the restaurant designer Sarah Saunders. While at the mansion,  Assange must observe a curfew and be tagged. He will have to report  daily to a police station, and £200,000 in security, raised by his  supporters, has been paid into the court.
But there are no  restrictions now on his access to the internet or communications,  meaning he is much more able to defend himself and WikiLeaks from US  anger.
The legal victory for Assange yesterday was a small step in  what is likely to be a long battle. Ouseley warned him that the Swedish  warrant was likely to be upheld, and that he would be extradited to  face a trial for the alleged attacks. Assange's mother, Christine, who  was in court, said she was "very, very happy". She added: "I can't wait  to see my son and to hold him close. I had faith in the British justice  system to do the right thing, and that faith has been confirmed today."
For  hours, it was far from certain that Assange's supporters and lawyers  would manage to get him out in time. They had struggled to track down  five more people the judge had approved as guarantors that Assange will  observe his strict bail conditions. Some had to go to City of  Westminster magistrates to sign the official paperwork and others who  were out of London had to go to nominated police stations.
Among  those approved by the high court to act as surety were the Nobel prize  winner Sir John Sulston, Lord Evans, an ex-Labour minister and former  chairman of Faber & Faber, and the Marchioness of Worcester. Ouseley  said he was concerned that some on the list of people willing to act as  surety were doing so because they supported WikiLeaks, and would think a  greater cause had been served if Assange skipped bail to avoid trial in  Sweden.
He warned Assange that if he tried to flee he would be  "found to have exploited quite ruthlessly those who have put their trust  in him and to have let them down".
On Channel 4 News last night,  Assange maintained he was the victim of a conspiracy orchestrated by the  US with the assistance of the Swedish intelligence service.
"There  is an ongoing attempt by the US to extradite me to the US and that  extradition is much more likely to occur if I am already in Sweden."
He  said his Swedish legal team had now been passed evidence relating to  the rape charges against him. "There has never been a single page  provided to me in English and, until two weeks ago, not a single page  whatsoever provided in any form to my Swedish counsel – even in Swedish.  This is a clear, clear abuse of process."
Assange later described  the rape allegations against him as "a very successful smear campaign  and a very wrong one". Speaking on BBC 2's Newsnight, he said  information relating to accusations had been leaked either by "the  Swedish prosecution service or some organisations that have obtained  selective material".
He said: "My lawyers informed me this  afternoon there will be another smear attempt relating to this  investigation some time tomorrow."
Speaking outside Ellingham Hall  later, Assange said his lawyers in Sweden had got hold of 100 pages of  material related to the allegations but he had yet to receive a  comprehensive English translation.
He said there could also be an attempt by the US to charge him with spying.
"We  have heard today from one of my US lawyers, yet to be confirmed, but a  serious matter, that there may be a US indictment for espionage for me,  coming from a secret US grand jury investigation," he told Sky TV.
"Obviously  it is extremely serious, and one of the concerns that we have had since  I have been in the UK is whether the extradition proceeding to Sweden,  which is occurring in a very strange and unusual way, is actually an  attempt to get me into a jurisdiction which will then make it easier to  extradite me to the United States."


 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment